Parts whose designs are no longer an open secret, continue to cultivate confusion about the amendment of article 61 bis of the Penal Code, freedom of expression and defense of human man. Since calling for a boycott of tourism in Tunisia is to address the sources of income for much of the Tunisian population. And this has nothing to do with freedom of expression. Call for boycott of tourism in Tunisia is depriving young girls who worked night and day to produce a carpet and sell it to feed a disabled father, a mother aged and younger siblings without resources. And this has nothing to do with the defense of human rights. The camel
of Zaafrane or Douz, the potters of Jerba, Nabeul ceramists who live mainly from tourism, divers of Zarzis who sell their sponges to tourists, the reefs of Tabarka who sell their wares to tourists ... can not no way identify with the concept of freedom of expression professed by Kamel Jendoubi Khemais Chammari, Radia Nasraoui. That is to say all those who apply for charity food before the doors of the European Parliament in Brussels or Strasbourg.
Then, the Tunisian government has the duty to protect the livelihoods of its people against those who are defenders of human rights and who simply do not have more right or less right as other citizens .
But beyond the cynical and opportunistic Jendoubi Kamel and his friends, probably due to an ideological identity crisis of the far left, it is perhaps time that the democratic opposition and human rights Rights define and adopt a code of conduct the nature of international support ethically acceptable and which would be reprehensible, especially since we see more and more "activists" seek support from abroad.
0 comments:
Post a Comment